Traditional fishing has long been under scrutiny for its impact on marine ecosystems. Industrial-scale fishing practices have led to overfishing, reduced biodiversity, and, ultimately, the jeopardisation of an important protein source for billions.
The potential for cultivated seafood to offer a sustainable source of protein can't be overstated. Rather than depleting oceanic resources, this innovative approach involves cultivating fish and shellfish cells, offering a product that mirrors the taste and texture of 'natural' seafood³. In doing so, it sidesteps the numerous negative externalities associated with industrial fishing¹.
Why should you care? Traditional seafood production is hitting planetary boundaries hard. The situation appears bleak, with more than 85% of the world's fisheries already pushed to or beyond their biological limits. Thus, the argument for cultivated seafood becomes not just viable but compelling. Unlike traditional fishing methods that can be limited by seasonal cycles, fish migration, and regulatory constraints, cultivated seafood production is theoretically limitless. This is particularly pertinent given the projected 14% growth in global seafood demand by 2030, driven by burgeoning markets in Asia, Europe, Latin America, and Oceania.
It should also be noted that cultivating seafood occurs in controlled environments. This allows for a more consistent product and makes it possible to sidestep issues of overfishing and bycatch¹.
The narrative around traditional seafood rightly revolves around the damaging impact on marine ecosystems. But, by cultivating fish and shellfish cells in controlled environments, we might be able to lessen the environmental footprint of seafood consumption¹,⁶. Yet, how does this innovation align with a world facing the grim reality of overfished oceans and dwindling marine ecosystems?
Cultivated seafood could indeed offer an ecological reprieve. The extraction from wild fish populations, which are already at or beyond their ecological limits, is bypassed¹⁷. Those concerned with the devastating effects of overfishing, such as habitat destruction and ecological imbalance, might find solace in this alternative. Cultivated seafood is inherently a non-extractive process, reliant on cell culture technology rather than destructive fishing techniques¹⁰.
It's not just about what you save; it's also about what you expend. Cultivated seafood production demands controlled environments with regulated temperature and humidity alongside particular nutrient needs—all of which consume energy²⁰. Moreover, if this energy isn't sustainably sourced, the carbon footprint could still be high, potentially offsetting the ecological benefits of reduced wild-catch¹⁸.
Graph by the US Environmental Working Group (EWG)
A surprising amount of carbon dioxide is released due to domestic water use as these graphs show for older homes (left) and new build homes (Credit: Waterwise/Javier Hirschfeld)
What are the long-term climate implications of these energy inputs? While avoiding wild-catch seafood offers some relief from marine ecosystem pressures, there is a trade-off. Could it be that the energy consumption associated with cellular agriculture might mitigate the initial environmental gains? The research suggests that fish's carbon footprint can often be lower than meat's, yet energy-intensive cell-based fish could challenge this notion¹¹ ¹². Nevertheless, we haven't even begun to utilise renewable energy sources in a full scale to mitigate these consumption needs.
Waste is another factor. While cultivated seafood avoids certain ecological pitfalls of traditional seafood production, such as by-catch and water pollution, it introduces its waste stream⁹. Used culture media and other laboratory by-products necessitate proper disposal or recycling, introducing another layer of environmental complexity¹⁹. Could there be a secondary market for these by-products? Indeed, the principles of a circular economy suggest that by-products from cellular agriculture could find a second life as agricultural fertilisers, aligning waste streams with nutrient cycles. An avenue perhaps for them to be utilised as inputs into renewable energy processes? Certainly, these by-products could also be converted into bioenergy, offering a method to offset some of the energy consumption associated with cellular agriculture.
Unlike traditional seafood, cultivated options offer an intriguing nutritional advantage profile that deserves attention. These health benefits may influence consumer choice and become a focal point for regulatory bodies looking to promote healthier food options.
Summary of results from the surveys of regulated contaminants in fish sampled at known locations in UK waters. Concentrations are given in milligram of metal per kilogram of seawater, and nanogram of metal per kilogram of seawater, as well as picogram total toxic equivalency (TEQ, defined by the World Health Organization – WHO) per gram of seawater. * indicates use of 90th percentile value.
Perhaps one of the most compelling arguments favouring cultivated seafood is its lack of environmental contaminants. As the New Blue Economy Seafood Sector report indicates, cultivated seafood is notably free from contaminants such as mercury and microplastics, often found in their wild-caught counterparts²³. Given the increasing concerns regarding the long-term effects of such contaminants, this feature could be a game-changer for public health. Although the full scope of these health risks remains a topic of ongoing research, preliminary studies suggest a potential for negative impacts, such as neurological issues and endocrine disruption.
The cellular cultivation process allows for precise control over the nutritional profile of the seafood, thereby offering the possibility to enhance particular nutrients or eliminate undesirable elements. This control is not feasible with wild-caught seafood, where nutrient levels can fluctuate significantly depending on many variables, including diet, water quality, and season. The precise nature of cultivated seafood’s nutritional profile could lead to customised seafood products that cater to specific health needs or dietary restrictions.
Cultivated seafood also presents a reduced risk of foodborne illnesses. Since the cells are cultivated in a controlled environment, the chance for cross-contamination with pathogens common in industrial aquaculture or open-water fishing is considerably lower. While robust systems are in place to check for such contamination in traditional seafood, it's evident that the closed-loop system of cultivated seafood offers a level of biosecurity that could lead to safer consumption.
With growing awareness of food provenance and ethical sourcing, cultivated seafood is a salient alternative to traditional options. The ethical underpinnings of this emerging food category hold implications beyond sustainability—encompassing public health, particularly mental well-being.
Consumer sentiment increasingly leans towards ethical choices in food consumption. While these choices do not present a health benefit in the traditional sense—vitamins, nutrients, and so on—a body of evidence suggests a correlation between ethical consumer choices and positive mental health outcomes. Such psychological benefits may include decreased cognitive dissonance and subsequent stress reduction attributable to ethical consumption habits.
The element of trust in ethical and transparent sourcing could feasibly drive more healthful consumer choices, adding another layer to the public health conversation. The consumer focus on transparency and ethical considerations potentially makes cultivated seafood a more compelling option, as it is relatively easier to assure its ethical sourcing than conventional alternatives.
From a nutritional standpoint, cultivated seafood is under examination for its potential health benefits. Initial research indicates that cultivated variants may offer fewer contaminants and a more beneficial nutritional profile, particularly in the context of omega-3 fatty acids. These preliminary findings add nuance to the role of cultivated seafood, suggesting it is not merely an alternative but possibly a preferable option for the health-conscious.
This article was written with Grammarly
Wildtype Shiok Meats BlueNalu
‘Fishless fish’: the next big trend in the seafood industry. The Guardian.
Literature Review Consumer Preferences for Seafood and ... - GFI
The 35 Easiest Ways to Reduce Your Carbon Footprint
Climate change: Top 10 tips to reduce carbon footprint revealed
Environmental Impacts of Food Production - Our World in Data
The hidden impact of your daily water use - BBC Future
Climate change is threatening our oceans. Alternative seafood can help ...
‘Fishless fish’: the next big trend in the seafood industry
An ocean of opportunity | Plant-based & cultivated seafood | GFI
Cell-Based Fish: A Novel Approach to Seafood Production and an ...
Blue revolution: Seafood sector pioneers pilot technologies and ...
Eating seafood can reduce your carbon footprint, but some fish are ...
Most fish has a lower carbon footprint than meat, but not all ...
Eat more fish: when switching to seafood helps — and when it doesn’t
New Study How to Design Marine Farms to Mitigate Climate Change
Seafood and Climate Change: The Blue Food | WWF
The Environmental Impact of Food & Seafood - Sustainable Fisheries UW
Frontiers | Towards Environmental Sustainability in Marine Finfish
Food Footprint: Is Eating Seafood Better for the Climate Than Meat?
Land and water use issues in aquaculture - Responsible Seafood Advocate
Aquaculture: why the world needs a new wave of food production
Sustainable Seafood Initiative | Alternative proteins | GFI
Alternative seafood: Assessing food, nutrition and livelihood ... - CGIAR
The next wave: Alternative seafood solutions | McKinsey
Major foodborne pathogens in fish and fish products: a review
Consumable Fish and Shellfish | US EPA
Contaminants in fish and seafood - Centre for Environment, Fisheries
Shellfish sleuths- seafood-borne human illness investigations
Food safety - World Health Organization (WHO)
Food Poisoning from Seafood | Travelers' Health | CDC
With public and private sector support, cultivated seafood can restore
Why is sustainable seafood good for you? | Marine Stewardship Council - MSC
Is Seafood Healthy? - EatingWell
Fish, health, and sustainability: What to know - Medical News Today